XM无法为美国居民提供服务。

US Supreme Court won't hear 5-Hour Energy drink pricing case



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>US Supreme Court won't hear 5-Hour Energy drink pricing case</title></head><body>

By Mike Scarcella

Oct. 7(Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear 5-Hour Energy drink maker Living Essentials’ challenge to a lawsuit claiming it gave discounts to retail giant Costco that undercut other wholesalers.

The justices turned away Living Essentials’ appeal of a lower court's decision last year that said the wholesalers could sue to level the playing field for the popular energy shot.

The Supreme Court issued its order without comment, and the wholesalers’ case will now return to the federal district court in Los Angeles, where the lawsuit was filed in 2018 against Living Essentials and its parent company Innovation Ventures.

Living Essentials and attorneys for the wholesalers did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Costco, which was not a defendant in the lawsuit, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The plaintiffs, including U.S. Wholesale Outlet & Distribution and other sellers, said they competed with Costco for retail sales of 5-Hour Energy drinks, which come in small bottles and give users a jolt of caffeine.

They accused Living Essentials of violating the Robinson-Patman Act, a U.S. antitrust law that broadly forbids a company from charging different prices for the same product to two or more competitors.

Living Essentials countered that Costco was a retailer and not a rival to the wholesalers, and so the price discrimination law should not apply.

A U.S. judge agreed with Living Essentials, but a panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year overturned the lower court ruling.

Living Essentials argued in a filing at the Supreme Court that the appeals court order threatened to expose more companies to liability over price discounts.


The case is Innovation Ventures and Living Essentials et al v. U.S. Wholesale Outlet & Distributors et al, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 23-1099.

For petitioners: David Frederick of Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick

For respondents: Mark Poe of Gaw Poe



</body></html>

免责声明: XM Group仅提供在线交易平台的执行服务和访问权限,并允许个人查看和/或使用网站或网站所提供的内容,但无意进行任何更改或扩展,也不会更改或扩展其服务和访问权限。所有访问和使用权限,将受下列条款与条例约束:(i) 条款与条例;(ii) 风险提示;以及(iii) 完整免责声明。请注意,网站所提供的所有讯息,仅限一般资讯用途。此外,XM所有在线交易平台的内容并不构成,也不能被用于任何未经授权的金融市场交易邀约和/或邀请。金融市场交易对于您的投资资本含有重大风险。

所有在线交易平台所发布的资料,仅适用于教育/资讯类用途,不包含也不应被视为用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议,或是交易价格纪录,或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。

本网站上由XM和第三方供应商所提供的所有内容,包括意见、新闻、研究、分析、价格、其他资讯和第三方网站链接,皆保持不变,并作为一般市场评论所提供,而非投资性建议。所有在线交易平台所发布的资料,仅适用于教育/资讯类用途,不包含也不应被视为适用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议,或是交易价格纪录,或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。请确保您已阅读并完全理解,XM非独立投资研究提示和风险提示相关资讯,更多详情请点击 这里

风险提示: 您的资金存在风险。杠杆商品并不适合所有客户。请详细阅读我们的风险声明