Texas attorney general sues insulin makers and pharmacy middlemen over high costs
Adds OptumRx, Cigna and Sanofi responses in paragraphs 11-15
Oct 3 (Reuters) -The Texas attorney general has sued leading insulin manufacturers and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), accusing them of collaborating to inflate the cost of insulin.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's office said on Thursday it had sued insulin makers Eli Lilly LLY.N, Novo Nordisk NOVOb.CO and Sanofi SASY.PA.
The office had also sued PBMs, including CVS' CVS.N Caremark, Cigna's CI.N Express Scripts, and UnitedHealth's UNH.N OptumRx, who act as intermediaries in negotiating drug prices and coverage.
WHY IT'S IMPORTANT
The lawsuit targets both insulin manufacturers and PBMs. The previous action by U.S. antitrust regulators only targeted PBMs.
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission, in September, sued the same PBMs, accusing them of steering diabetes patients towards higher-priced insulin in order to secure millions of dollars in rebates from pharmaceutical companies.
At that time, the FTC had not sued the insulin manufacturers, but had criticized their role in what it called a broken system.
CONTEXT
In the Texas lawsuit, Paxton accused that manufacturers artificially raised the prices of insulin and then paid a significant, undisclosed portion back to the PBMs for preferential treatment in return.
The PBMs subsequently awarded preferred status to the manufacturer with the highest list prices, while excluding lower-priced drugs, the press release from the attorney general's office said.
KEY QUOTE
"Big Pharma insulin manufacturers and PBMs worked together to take advantage of diabetes patients and drive prices as high as they could," said Paxton.
"Allegations that we play any role in determining the prices charged by manufacturers for their products are false, and we intend to vigorously defend against this baseless suit," CVS said inan emailed statement.
"This lawsuit is without merit and ignores the reality of the current market," UnitedHealth's OptumRx said.
While Cigna did not provide a direct comment, the company redirected Reuters to its Sept. 20 statement , where it said the action filed by the FTC related to insulin pricing is demonstrably baseless.
"Novo Nordisk believes that the allegations in the lawsuit are meritless, and we intend to vigorously defend against these claims," a company spokesperson told Reuters.
"While we will not comment on the specifics of the allegations, Sanofi's pricing practices have always complied with the law," the French drugmaker said in an emailed statement.
Lilly did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Reporting by Puyaan Singh and Mariam Sunny in Bengaluru; Editing by Mohammed Safi Shamsi
免责声明: XM Group仅提供在线交易平台的执行服务和访问权限，并允许个人查看和/或使用网站或网站所提供的内容，但无意进行任何更改或扩展，也不会更改或扩展其服务和访问权限。所有访问和使用权限，将受下列条款与条例约束：(i) 条款与条例；(ii) 风险提示；以及(iii) 完整免责声明。请注意，网站所提供的所有讯息，仅限一般资讯用途。此外，XM所有在线交易平台的内容并不构成，也不能被用于任何未经授权的金融市场交易邀约和/或邀请。金融市场交易对于您的投资资本含有重大风险。
所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。
本网站上由XM和第三方供应商所提供的所有内容，包括意见、新闻、研究、分析、价格、其他资讯和第三方网站链接，皆保持不变，并作为一般市场评论所提供，而非投资性建议。所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为适用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。请确保您已阅读并完全理解，XM非独立投资研究提示和风险提示相关资讯，更多详情请点击 这里。
