Nuclear renaissance must still solve for spent fuel: Ross Kerber
The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. This column is part of the weekly Reuters Sustainable Finance newsletter, which you can sign up for here
By Ross Kerber
Oct 16 (Reuters) -As nuclear power companies gear up to revive old reactors and build a generation of new ones to meet burgeoning power demandsfor artificial intelligence, cryptocurrency and electric vehicles, they still face a daunting risk-management task: what to do with thousands of tons of spent reactor fuel.
TheU.S. nuclear-power renaissance is plunging ahead without a long-term solution for some 92,500 metric tons of spent fuel piled up at power plant sites around the country.Another 2,000 metric tons is added every year, according to figures from industry trade group the Nuclear Energy Institute.
That's even before the planned new nuclear capacity coming viadeals like one betweenMicrosoft and Constellation Energy CEG.O and anotherbetween Alphabet's GOOGL.O Google and Kairos Power, both well-covered by my colleagues Timothy Gardner and Laila Kearney.
The waste was supposed to go to a permanent underground facility at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. But its development was halted by former President Barack Obama's administration under political pressure.
Currently the U.S. Department of Energy is working on 'consent-based' siting, or sending the waste to places willing to takeit, but that's slow going. A planned storage facility is western Texas is tied up in court.
It would be good to hurry up. About 40,000 metric tons of the spent fuel in the U.S. is stored in poolsrequiring power. One worry when a tsunami knocked out power at Japan's Fukushima nuclear plant in 2011 was that its storage pools would overheat, though later examination showed they did not, according to the U.S. Congressional Research Service.
The majority of the spent U.S. nuclearfuel has been moved into "dry cask" storage that does not need continuous power. Still Edwin Lyman, director of nuclear power safety for the Union of Concerned Scientists, said he worries that regulators and energy executives are plunging ahead while leaving spent fuel stored onsite indefinitely.
However safe things are currently, "it is absurd to believe that it will be true forever," Lyman said.
Matthew Wald, an energy analyst at The Breakthrough Institute, a climate-focused think tank, said power companies have robust safety records managing spent fuel and that many of their costs are covered by federal payments they receive over the Energy Department’s failure to open a long-term storage site.
But public concerns about waste handling remain, he said. "From a technical standpoint, it’s not urgent, but solving the waste problem would help get new reactors built," Wald said.
Other countries like France face similar challenges managing spent nuclear fuel. Constellation is the largest U.S. nuclear power operator with 12 nuclear plants in service.
As of Dec. 31 its facilities stored about a fifth of the total spent fuel in the U.S. based onthe company's most recent annual report.
The company has a nuclear oversight committee charged with overseeing safe and reliable facility operations, chaired by John Richardson, a retired U.S. Navy admiral. It has committed to declassify its staggered board, a structure unpopular with investors.
One of two reactors at the Three Mile Island nuclear power station suffered a partial meltdown in 1979 in the worst U.S. nuclear power accident. The other reactor continued to operate until 2019 and would be restarted under Constellation'sdeal with Microsoft.
Safety is its number one priority, Constellation said in a statement sent by a representative. "We diligently contain, number, catalogue, track and isolate spent nuclear fuel used by our facilities, so we know where every ounce is located. As an industry, nuclear is the only large-scale energy source that takes full responsibility for all of its waste and plans for its eventual disposal," Constellation said.
Rod McCullum, senior director for the NEI trade group, said all of the spent fuel at Three Mile Island, 743 metric tons, has been moved to dry casks in preparation for a decommissioning. Now with a restart planned, the facility's cooling pool is empty. "That gives them a lot of operational flexibility," McCullum said.
Ultimately the industry believes a long-term solution will have to be in a place willing to accept the spent fuel, McCullum said, a deal never quite sealed with leaders in Nevada where Yucca Mountain is located.
"We’re on board with consent-based siting, whether its Yucca or anywhere else," he said.
Reporting by Ross Kerber; Editing by David Gregorio
免责声明: XM Group仅提供在线交易平台的执行服务和访问权限，并允许个人查看和/或使用网站或网站所提供的内容，但无意进行任何更改或扩展，也不会更改或扩展其服务和访问权限。所有访问和使用权限，将受下列条款与条例约束：(i) 条款与条例；(ii) 风险提示；以及(iii) 完整免责声明。请注意，网站所提供的所有讯息，仅限一般资讯用途。此外，XM所有在线交易平台的内容并不构成，也不能被用于任何未经授权的金融市场交易邀约和/或邀请。金融市场交易对于您的投资资本含有重大风险。
所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。
本网站上由XM和第三方供应商所提供的所有内容，包括意见、新闻、研究、分析、价格、其他资讯和第三方网站链接，皆保持不变，并作为一般市场评论所提供，而非投资性建议。所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为适用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。请确保您已阅读并完全理解，XM非独立投资研究提示和风险提示相关资讯，更多详情请点击 这里。
