EU champions’ hope will slam into hard M&A reality
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Liam Proud
LONDON, Oct 16 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Brussels wants European companies to join together and compete with U.S. and Chinese rivals. In many cases, however, national politicians and investors may have different ideas. Unless European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen can resolve that tension, she won’t get the European corporate champions that she and her colleagues desire.
For investment bankers with long memories, it’s ironic that the historically deal-sceptic Commission is now concerned about a lack of corporate heft. Outgoing antitrust boss Margrethe Vestager and her predecessors blocked deals ranging from the planned merger of Alstom ALSO.PA and Siemens’ train unit in 2019, Deutsche Börse’s DB1Gn.DE acquisition of exchange rival NYSE Euronext in 2012, and Schneider Electric’s SCHN.PA 6.4-billion-euro purchase of rival Legrand in 2001. Those deals, the Commission argued, could have created companies with too much market influence and the power to hike prices for customers.
Times have changed, however, and Brussels bigwigs now seem more worried about the puny size of their domestic companies. In a September “mission letter” to new competition chief Teresa Ribera, who takes over later this year, von der Leyen asked for a review of Europe’s merger guidelines, focusing on the need for greater “resilience, efficiency and innovation”. That’s antitrust code for “we want consolidation”. A few days later, Ribera promised that the rules would “evolve” to help European companies bulk up. The bloc is not alone: the new UK Labour government will ask its competition authority to prioritise growth, investment and innovation as part of a wider war on so-called “red tape”, Sky News reported on Monday.
The change of heart reflects a realisation that the European Union’s often subscale private sector may struggle to cope with capital-intensive trends like rising defence needs, the shift to a green economy and artificial intelligence. A recent report by former European Central Bank boss Mario Draghi estimated that the energy transition, digital investment and necessary extra military spending could require up to 800 billion euros of annual investment across both the public and private sector.
Europe’s relatively puny companies may struggle to muster those kinds of resources. The region is home to just 99 of the world’s 500 largest public companies by market capitalisation, LSEG data shows, compared with 112 for Asia and 277 for the Americas. Amazon.com AMZN.O alone will invest about $66 billion through capital expenditures this year, according to analysts’ estimates gathered by LSEG. That’s more than the three biggest EU-based spenders combined: Volkswagen VOWG_p.DE, Deutsche Telekom DTEGn.DE and TotalEnergies TTEF.PA. The aggregate market capitalisation of five large U.S. technology companies – Apple AAPL.O, Nvidia NVDA.O, Microsoft MSFT.O, Alphabet GOOGL.O and Amazon – just about exceeds the value of the entire STOXX Europe 600 Index, which also includes UK-listed groups.
The question is whether looser competition policy alone can solve this. Draghi’s report mentions the need for consolidation in his chapters on telecoms, semiconductors and defence. With good reason: all three sectors are geopolitically important and also of paltry size compared with their Chinese and United States-based counterparts. The problem is that M&A isn’t obviously the right solution.
Start with telecoms. Most countries have a handful of mobile and broadband operators, with the largest market share typically held by a former state telephone monopoly like Telecom Italia TLIT.MI and Madrid-based Telefónica TEF.MC. Within-market deals can help save costs: France’s Orange ORAN.PA, for example, plans to generate 490 million euros of annual synergies by combing its Spanish unit with local player MásMóvil. Yet consolidation inside countries won’t create U.S.-style giants. Even if all the main markets went from the typical four-player structure down to three, Europe would still have a patchwork of local players rather than cross-border champions.
Meanwhile, the deals that would generate meaningful scale make little financial sense. A Deutsche Telekom-Orange merger, for example, would create a 160-billion-euro broadband and mobile champion with 156 billion euros of revenue this year – more than U.S. heavyweight Verizon VZ.N, according to analyst estimates gathered by LSEG. Beyond sheer size, though, it’s hard to see the industrial logic. Cross-border synergies are lacking in Europe’s fragmented and highly politicised telecom markets, bankers and analysts say. And operators with a global sprawl tend to incur a share-price penalty. Britain’s Vodafone VOD.L, for example, has been breaking itself up after failing to convince shareholders of the merits of a business model spanning many different European countries.
Semiconductors are another case in point. Netherlands-based 300-billion-euro equipment manufacturer ASML ASML.AS is the only European company in the sector with a 12-digit market capitalisation. Two of the other large regional chipmakers, Germany’s 40-billion-euro Infineon IFXGn.DE and Franco-Italian 23-billion-euro STMicroelectronics STMPA.PA, on paper look like possible candidates for a scale-building merger. Yet the logic for investors would probably be limited to having a more diversified set of customers, analysts told Breakingviews, which might not be enough to offset the political controversy of such a project. Countries tend to jealously guard local chip investments, meaning cost savings could be minimal.
There’s a similar risk in the defence industry, where combinations involving national players like France’s Thales TCFP.PA, Italy’s Leonardo LDOF.MI and Germany’s Rheinmetall RHMG.DE would only work with the aid of national political backing. That’s so far lacking, and it’s not clear that von der Leyen has the heft to change it.
The common theme, then, is that cross-border deals in strategically key sectors are either financially or politically tricky – and often both. Nor does it help that investors often seem allergic to the idea of ambitious dealmaking. Shares in Norwegian oil group Equinor EQNR.OL dropped 4% immediately after it unveiled a 10% stake in Danish wind-power group Orsted ORSTED.CO last week. Back in 2019, when Infineon announced a $10 billion transatlantic acquisition, its shares sold off by 5% in the morning, and trailed STM’s over the ensuing months. Understandably, shareholders are generally suspicious of expansionist projects that add risk and complexity to a company’s equity story.
That’s not to say that von der Leyen and Ribera’s efforts will be worthless. Permitting local telco rollups would relieve pressure on the operators’ investment budgets, potentially boosting fibre broadband investment. And in situations where national capitals get behind a deal, as was the case with Siemens-Alstom, it seems likely that the Commission will no longer be an obstacle. Yet instances where politicians, CEOs and investors all agree on a cross-border merger are relatively rare. There’s only so much that von der Leyen and Ribera can do alone.
Follow @Breakingviews on X
CONTEXT NEWS
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen wants her new antitrust chief Teresa Ribera to review the bloc’s merger guidelines, with a view to giving more weight to “resilience, efficiency and innovation”, according to a Sept. 17 mission letter.
Ribera told the Financial Times in a Sept. 19 interview that Europe’s competition rules would “evolve” to help European Union companies build the scale needed to take on U.S. and Chinese rivals.
The new UK Labour government will ask the country’s Competition and Markets Authority to prioritise growth, investment and innovation, Sky News reported on Oct. 14.
Graphic: Regional breakdown of 500 biggest listed companies https://reut.rs/482PX4V
Graphic: Biggest U.S. capex spenders dwarf EU ones https://reut.rs/3NpVuJe
Editing by George Hay and Oliver Taslic
免责声明: XM Group仅提供在线交易平台的执行服务和访问权限，并允许个人查看和/或使用网站或网站所提供的内容，但无意进行任何更改或扩展，也不会更改或扩展其服务和访问权限。所有访问和使用权限，将受下列条款与条例约束：(i) 条款与条例；(ii) 风险提示；以及(iii) 完整免责声明。请注意，网站所提供的所有讯息，仅限一般资讯用途。此外，XM所有在线交易平台的内容并不构成，也不能被用于任何未经授权的金融市场交易邀约和/或邀请。金融市场交易对于您的投资资本含有重大风险。
所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。
本网站上由XM和第三方供应商所提供的所有内容，包括意见、新闻、研究、分析、价格、其他资讯和第三方网站链接，皆保持不变，并作为一般市场评论所提供，而非投资性建议。所有在线交易平台所发布的资料，仅适用于教育/资讯类用途，不包含也不应被视为适用于金融、投资税或交易相关咨询和建议，或是交易价格纪录，或是任何金融商品或非应邀途径的金融相关优惠的交易邀约或邀请。请确保您已阅读并完全理解，XM非独立投资研究提示和风险提示相关资讯，更多详情请点击 这里。
